1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
7 |
| On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:11:54 -0400 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
| | > Well then leave it turned off, but put a note about the availability |
9 |
| | > of the feature in the comments above FEATURES= in make.conf. |
10 |
| | |
11 |
| | With FEATURES="noautossp" the user would be free to disable it on |
12 |
| | their own accord but being a responsible distribution to the users and |
13 |
| | the computing world we would/should not. |
14 |
| |
15 |
| Personally, I would be *very* wary about giving our x86 users a 5% |
16 |
| performance hit |
17 |
|
18 |
1. Where are you getting 5% from? |
19 |
2. What context is this "Performance" hit in? gcc would take a |
20 |
"performance" hit because it eats 100% CPU; most nothing else would take |
21 |
a "performance" hit unless the *overhead* pulled CPU usage up to 100% |
22 |
for a time. |
23 |
|
24 |
I guess this is the point where I have to ebuild unpack nbyte and |
25 |
generate SSP benchmarks. Why oh why didn't I bench ssp when I was doing |
26 |
PIC? |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
[...] |
30 |
|
31 |
| |
32 |
|
33 |
- -- |
34 |
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the |
35 |
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated. |
36 |
|
37 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
38 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) |
39 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
40 |
|
41 |
iD8DBQFBUimWhDd4aOud5P8RAqFLAJ9J847toJdMiRvwSMvg46qgyKDxAgCfRBG/ |
42 |
WXnLFqhDKhfIayzE3PpicQU= |
43 |
=lQWn |
44 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |