| 1 |
On 07/27/2014 03:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> If an arch team isn't going to honor a stable request, shouldn't they |
| 3 |
> remove themselves from it and say so? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Also, if an arch team does that, does that mean we don't have to file |
| 6 |
> stable requests for that arch on future versions of the package? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
When armin did stabilisation for minor archs in the past, he took the |
| 9 |
opportunity to evaluate whether it was still useful to have the package |
| 10 |
stable. In many cases for small random packages, stable keywords were |
| 11 |
dropped to reduce future workload. I always thought it was a pretty good |
| 12 |
strategy. |
Archives