| 1 |
On 6/28/05, Fernando J. Pereda <ferdy@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:19:34PM +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > I still don't see *WHY* you should be different from us. If you want to |
| 4 |
> > > manage your recruits then they can't be gentoo staff. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > One reason could be that we are _not_ going to be called developers but staff. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Can anybody explain me the difference between them ? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Well, you better discuss that with your fellow developers. It was they |
| 11 |
who didn't want us to become developers and gave us the title of staff |
| 12 |
instead. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> > > Arch teams have developed a new 'figure', the arch tester. Not official |
| 16 |
> > > gentoo staff but somehow involved with us; arch teams manage their own |
| 17 |
> > > arch tester recruitment process. If that's the situation you want then |
| 18 |
> > > they won't become gentoo staff. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > Didn't I say that was already agreed with devrel? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Do I have to quit saying that I think that's wrong? No thanks. You are |
| 23 |
> the only group that will make new devs apart from devrel. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
You are obviously free to state your opinion. But this *maybe* is not |
| 26 |
to be discussed with us. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> I still don't |
| 29 |
> see why you should deserve a different treatment. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I don't either: |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
*> > > Still, you weren't gentoo staff. Helping out since then doesn't make you |
| 34 |
*> > > any different from the recruitment point of view (IMHO). |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
> If you want to join us, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE follow our rules. They are |
| 38 |
> there to be followed if you didn't notice. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
If you didn't notice, as Christian already state before, we ARE |
| 41 |
official, we are NOT joining you. We are simply getting our DESERVED |
| 42 |
recognition. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> > > Still, you weren't gentoo staff. Helping out since then doesn't make you |
| 46 |
> > > any different from the recruitment point of view (IMHO). |
| 47 |
> > |
| 48 |
> > Then the problem is we should have been done in that moment, so this |
| 49 |
> > is one more reason in favor of taking old mods to staff with no quiz |
| 50 |
> > stright away. |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
> I hope you have stronger arguments... |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
IMHO that argument is more than enough. |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
-- |
| 57 |
Ioannis Aslanidis |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
<deathwing00[at]gentoo.org> 0xB9B11F4E |
| 60 |
<deathwing00[at]forums.gentoo.org> 0xC2539DA3 |
| 61 |
<aioannis[at]tinet.org> 0xF202D067 |
| 62 |
<dwcommander[at]users.sourceforge.net> |
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
Hellenic Gentoo GNU/Linux project manager (http://hellenicgentoo.sf.net) |
| 65 |
FIRECOPS++ project manager (http://firecops.sf.net) |
| 66 |
Digger Realoaded (http://digger-reloaded.sf.net) |
| 67 |
Gentoo Forums Global Moderator (http://forums.gentoo.org) |
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
Computer Engineering student at Universitat Rovira i Virgili |
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
-- |
| 72 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives