| 1 |
Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> as requested by multiple devrel members I have written a GLEP to standardize |
| 5 |
> bugzilla access for contributors. It has already been discussed on the |
| 6 |
> devrel mailing list before but I am looking for a wider opinion now. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> This is also a submission for the new council when it meets. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Best regards, |
| 11 |
> Stefan |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Errr. on -devrel you noted you would just make people take the ebuild |
| 14 |
quiz and now devrel wants a GLEP again? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I'll state the same thing I stated on that list. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
A. This already happens. I had bugs access for MONTHS before becoming |
| 19 |
a dev; I got assigned to the portage buggroup and I could edit portage |
| 20 |
bugs. Anyone already on the portage team could add me, so no nastiness |
| 21 |
for recruiters (or anyone else). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
B. Double bonus is that I don't even see why a GLEP is required? This |
| 24 |
is a small subset of users using one resource (bugzilla) so perhaps |
| 25 |
Infra and devrel and you can work out the requisite groups? Why is |
| 26 |
there all this red tape? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Create a group; come up with a subset of bugs that they can access, add |
| 29 |
user to group -> done. As long as they can't access my bugs; I really |
| 30 |
shouldn't (and trust me I don't) care. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
C. No real standard on any other fora. I don't need a GLEP to add |
| 33 |
someone to my project overlay, or grant them voice or ops in my |
| 34 |
project's IRC channel. I don't need a GLEP to get them subscribed to my |
| 35 |
mailing list and I don't need a GLEP to add them to (most) project |
| 36 |
aliases. Why does this require one? |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives