| 1 |
Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 2 |
>>However, the council asked for it, and so it was changed. And the council |
| 3 |
>>didn't ask for this on his own, they were just reflecting the majority of |
| 4 |
>>devs, so we'll have to accept that. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> If there's one thing I've learned in my tenure with this project is that |
| 8 |
> there is no such thing as a majority of devs. We never have the majority |
| 9 |
> agree on *anything*. So, I don't think that statement is accurate. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Heh, that's a valid point. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Not trying to be pedantic, but the notion that the majority of Gentoo |
| 14 |
> support(s|ed) GLEP 41 is one that I believe to be incorrect. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I've never said (that I think that) the majority supports GLEP 41. In fact, i |
| 17 |
think the vast majority bluntly doesn't care about it at all, as they aren't |
| 18 |
affected by it anyway. However, of those who gave feedback on the first draft, a |
| 19 |
majority said "we need a subdomain". Those who thought that a subdomain would be |
| 20 |
a bad idea didn't step up at that moment (including me), at least if I recall right. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Simon Stelling |
| 24 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead |
| 25 |
blubb@g.o |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives