Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:17:28
Message-Id: 487CCD6A.4030804@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
2 > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:58:01 +0300
3 > Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:
4 >> Yes I can think a lot of features like this that would be of great
5 >> use in the main tree but as long as Portage is the only official and
6 >> stable package manager and doesn't support the things you listed, the
7 >> GLEP is not of much use.
8 >
9 > So you're saying the GLEP's of no use until Portage supports them, but
10 > Portage can't support them until you say yes to the GLEP...
11 >
12
13 I am saying that it makes sense to approve both at the same time or have
14 other official package managers approved before accepting the GLEP.
15
16 Regards,
17 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 Joe Peterson <lavajoe@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o>