Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Discontinuing (more-than-absolutely-minimal) Python support for non-x86 arches
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:16:09
Message-Id: 2498445.X9hSmTKtgW@noumea
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Discontinuing (more-than-absolutely-minimal) Python support for non-x86 arches by James Le Cuirot
1 > >
2 > > https://github.com/zmedico/portage/compare/master...zmedico:drobbins-track
3 > > -keywords?expand=1
4 > That's kind of what ALLARCHES is for although IIRC the rules state that
5 > packages should still be initially keyworded in the usual way. Other
6 > distros do "noarch" though so the idea isn't without precedent.
7
8 It was a long discussion to get ALLARCHES finalized and accepted, and now
9 barely anyone is using it. (Most arch teams never bothered to adapt their
10 workflow.) Maybe we should do that for a start?
11
12 Anyway, ALLARCHES only affects stabilization, not keyword requests.
13
14 --
15 Andreas K. Hüttel
16 dilfridge@g.o
17 Gentoo Linux developer
18 (council, qa, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies