| 1 |
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 22:56 +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 2 |
> So, can other arch testers please pitch in with their $.02? If we gave you |
| 3 |
> rsync instead of CVS, would that be sufficient? Or do you need the |
| 4 |
> revision history, etc. of CVS? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> And, any objections to a ~30 minute delay between CVS<->this solution? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> --kurt |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I personally do not need Revision histories, I can't speak for other |
| 11 |
ATs. Rsync with 30min delay is a noted improvement over the standard |
| 12 |
rsync policy. Does this also allow us to sync to main rotation mirroes |
| 13 |
is that already overstressed? I ask because IIRC it may take ~30min for |
| 14 |
all the mirrors to sync up to the 'Latest' revision, therefore the sync |
| 15 |
that I do _may_ be up to 60min old (worstcase). so main rotation mirror |
| 16 |
access would be nice. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Feasable? I know not. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Later Days |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Lares Moreau <lares.moreau@×××××.com> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org |
| 23 |
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 Alberta, Canada |
| 24 |
Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pgp.net | Encrypted Mail Prefered |
| 25 |
Key fingerprint = 0CA3 E40D F897 7709 3628 C5D4 7D94 483E 0D46 BB6E |
Archives