Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luis Francisco Araujo <araujo@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-dev (an alternative to sunrise?)
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:30:05
Message-Id: 44CA56D7.3030100@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-dev (an alternative to sunrise?) by Robert Cernansky
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Robert Cernansky wrote:
5 > Oh, if I can speak for me as a user I'll not like it. One of the major
6 > advantage of Gentoo is easy maintenace (not mindless, but easy if you
7 > know what you are doing) thanks to portage system. Another is
8 > availability of large number of software in distribution. These two
9 > together gives easily maintanable operating system - because of
10 > portage and because I do not need to maintain lot of packages by
11 > myself.
12 >
13
14 I don't know what it is your point here. But i guess, yes, as an user
15 you shouldn't be worried about it. This is just another way for
16 cooperating with the project for those interested in doing so.
17
18 > If I have some application that is not included in portage why
19 > I decide to make an ebuild? Because I hope that then it will be
20 > accepted and included to portage, so maintained by developers (big
21 > thanks for this). If I have to take care of package + ebuild +
22 > dependencies, I'll rather choose not to make an ebulid but compile
23 > package right from .tar.gz archive.
24 >
25
26 Dependencies are not 'magically' solved. Somebody needs to initially
27 takes care of them.
28
29 > Sorry for being such a bad user. But I'm pretty busy mostly so I'm
30 > glad If I find time to make an initial ebuild and submit. In that
31 > case, I see no problem to submit right to bugzilla and dicuss/fix/test
32 > the ebuild there.
33 >
34
35 That is a different way to cooperate with us.
36
37 > I would agree with your points of user responsibilty to solve bugs,
38 > dependencies and so on, but only until package is accepted and
39 > included to portage.
40 >
41
42 We need to know before committing this stuff to the tree that the user
43 will compromise at some degree. And this kind of work is a good sign of
44 it. We already have too many unmaintained stuff.
45
46
47 - --
48
49
50 Luis F. Araujo "araujo at gentoo.org"
51 Gentoo Linux
52
53
54 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
55 Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)
56
57 iD8DBQFEylbXdZ42PGEF17URAiJ8AJ4hhP8DN5W6eRa9MTBA5md+qaLyRQCfW2Oe
58 jhsfuMDxntw7okoD4qI1Zrg=
59 =4ms8
60 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
61 --
62 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-dev (an alternative to sunrise?) Robert Cernansky <hslists2@××××××.sk>