Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Klavs Klavsen <kl@××××.dk>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: security updates only? (security-1.0.ebuild)
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 15:56:18
Message-Id: 1061049373.3338.4.camel@amd.vsen.dk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: security updates only? (security-1.0.ebuild) by Paul de Vrieze
1 How about starting with putting the GLSA's in the tree?
2
3 That would be step 1.
4
5 Then an emerge sync would give you new security information too.
6 or perhaps an glsa-ebuild?
7
8 After this, I agree it would be best to add a --security option.
9
10 IMHO this should work, so emerge -u world --security (or -S - or is that
11 too close to -s?) would look at all the upgrades suggested by the world
12 - and then check against the glsa's and see if any of them have are
13 mentioned here. The glsa's should be named after the package version
14 that fixes this issue, that way it would be easy to check and upgrade if
15 the currently installed is older.
16
17 Better solutions are welcome - but are they as easy to implement as
18 this?
19 --
20 Regards,
21 Klavs Klavsen, GSEC - kl@××××.dk - http://www.vsen.dk
22 PGP: 7E063C62/2873 188C 968E 600D D8F8 B8DA 3D3A 0B79 7E06 3C62
23 See my new CMS Hosting Service at http://www.VirkPaaNettet.dk
24
25 Working with Unix is like wrestling a worthy opponent.
26 Working with windows is like attacking a small whining child
27 who is carrying a .38.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: security updates only? (security-1.0.ebuild) Karsten Schulz <kaschu@×××××××××.de>