| 1 |
On 07/22/2013 12:22 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:16 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> pros: |
| 5 |
>> - consistency of tree quality |
| 6 |
does not apply to p.mask'd packages |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
>> - less user confusion (the checksum failures alone get us a lot of bugs |
| 9 |
>> every release without people realizing what it means...) and people |
| 10 |
>> expect packages to work in the tree |
| 11 |
maybe |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
>> - less bugs no one can do anything about |
| 14 |
does not apply |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
>> - easier contribution of users in an overlay, testing of hacks or other |
| 17 |
>> stuff to make it work |
| 18 |
does not apply |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
>> - making clear that gentoo does not support software with such low QA |
| 21 |
does not apply |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
>> - making clear that this software is experimental |
| 24 |
applies |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Half of those apply also to p.mask'd packages as Duncan pointed out. Maybe |
| 29 |
> even more than half. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
Archives