Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>
To: "gentoo-dev@l.g.o" <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: remove sci-geosciences/googleearth from the tree
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:22:18
Message-Id: CAHcsgXQLeUV1yLhLWqsJJRVBMuMQ1y3nkf+Ds3-bQL2vdEp__g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: remove sci-geosciences/googleearth from the tree by hasufell
1 On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:16 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
2
3 > pros:
4 > - consistency of tree quality
5 > - less user confusion (the checksum failures alone get us a lot of bugs
6 > every release without people realizing what it means...) and people
7 > expect packages to work in the tree
8 > - less bugs no one can do anything about
9 > - easier contribution of users in an overlay, testing of hacks or other
10 > stuff to make it work
11 > - making clear that gentoo does not support software with such low QA
12 > - making clear that this software is experimental
13 >
14
15 Half of those apply also to p.mask'd packages as Duncan pointed out. Maybe
16 even more than half.
17
18
19 Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
20 flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Replies