| 1 |
If you really wanna flamefest... at least do it in private in our |
| 2 |
forums: http://forums.gentoo.org (SSL enabled, if you want). At least |
| 3 |
the flames will remain internal! :) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On 3/8/07, Tom Wesley <tom@×××××.net> wrote: |
| 6 |
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:50:11PM +0100, expose@×××××××××××.net wrote: |
| 7 |
> > Hi, |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > to place my personal opinion, too but seperated from information/facts: |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > I feel like a netiquette should be developed, people who break it too often |
| 12 |
> > should be warned, then banned. |
| 13 |
> > When the situation normalizes again, there will be no banning anymore anyway |
| 14 |
> > automatically. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > Would be nice to know how others feel, wether something should be changed or |
| 17 |
> > (why) not, and if so, what ideas are like. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > Doing this quick overview showed (even though I never mentioned Gentoo myself) |
| 20 |
> > that the message of Gentoo and it's mailinglists spreaded quickly on IRC, |
| 21 |
> > which is something else I dislike to see... |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Please could you stop attempting to create new threads by replying to |
| 25 |
> existing emails to the list? It's considered bad netiquette and |
| 26 |
> generally makes new threads difficult to spot. The list is hard enough |
| 27 |
> to parse as it is, without this added hindrance. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking has the details if it is |
| 30 |
> something you're unaware of. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Tom |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Ioannis Aslanidis |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
<deathwing00[at]gentoo.org> 0xB9B11F4E |
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives