Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o, gentoo-licenses@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Removal of the as-is (so-called) license | ||
| Date: | Mon, 19 May 2014 08:57:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | 21369.51054.802271.614304@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Clarify the "as-is" license? by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | For almost all packages that had previously used "as-is", the LICENSE |
| 2 | variable has been updated now. We are down from some 700 packages in |
| 3 | mid-2012 to only 2 packages today (and course of action is clear for |
| 4 | these remaining ones). See bug 436214 for details. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | So, as soon as the remaining packages are fixed, I am going to remove |
| 7 | the deprecated as-is license from the Portage tree. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Please fix your overlays if you haven't done so yet. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of the as-is (so-called) license | Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of the as-is (so-called) license | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of the as-is (so-called) license | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |