| 1 |
On Friday 19 March 2004 11:05, xtv@×××××.de wrote: |
| 2 |
> I think this would be a good feature for desktop-gentoo-users which dont |
| 3 |
> want to be intimidated with a too much on configuration details and/or |
| 4 |
> missing skills to configure everything they want by webminor vi. Also you |
| 5 |
> could replace the rpm-support with portage-support and would have a good |
| 6 |
> base for a gentoo-installer. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
It would be a good feature for such users. I've used SuSE Linux since 6.4 to |
| 9 |
9.0 and YaST has become really nice and it has a large hardware database. |
| 10 |
But one reason because i've swiched to gentoo was Yast too. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I've installed Linux 2.6.3 and i got some problems with the soundcard. There |
| 13 |
was somewhere a conflict with Yast/ALSA and I was not able to use Yast again |
| 14 |
to configure the soundcard. Some components of Yast might be adapted to the |
| 15 |
distribution itself (Kernel, Libs etc). |
| 16 |
Someone there who have more knowledge about this? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
One other point is that Yast stores all settings in a own DB and overwrite the |
| 19 |
config files in /etc even changes by the user. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I believe to use Yast in Gentoo there are some changes necessary to prevent |
| 23 |
conflicts but it might be a good choice. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
mfg |
| 26 |
Nicolas |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives