| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Thursday 22 January 2004 15:03, Brad House wrote: |
| 5 |
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but the gentoo development community |
| 6 |
> as a whole would probably have to switch to something other |
| 7 |
> than CVS. In my experience from CVS, trying to merge back |
| 8 |
> in changes from 2 different branches are nearly impossible (if |
| 9 |
> we wanted to merge in changes from the 'unofficial' branch). |
| 10 |
> Personally, I don't have time to learn some other system at this |
| 11 |
> point in time, so I'd vote against this. Please correct me if |
| 12 |
> I'm wrong on the merging front there, but I use it every day |
| 13 |
> at work, and it's one of the things that gets to me most about |
| 14 |
> CVS. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I think that indeed subversion is superior to CVS, especially on the part |
| 17 |
where you want to look at changesets and merging. Maybe we could test |
| 18 |
subversion, but we might want to wait until the 1.0 version is released |
| 19 |
for actual use (is going to be rather soon now) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Paul |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
- -- |
| 24 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 25 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 26 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 27 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
| 28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
iD8DBQFAD+GIbKx5DBjWFdsRAmayAKCvnXplkbloYHlozWjGGv+rHh5GRgCfaHRe |
| 32 |
2ZZwwgB/3Lw/TsKf1CnP8k0= |
| 33 |
=B8of |
| 34 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives