Archives
Archives
| From: | "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:30:11 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4E341526.7020409@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? by Samuli Suominen |
||
| 1 | Samuli Suominen schrieb: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > Someone mentioned NFS mount on /usr. Do we have other reasons? How |
| 4 | > many users that might be? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | If you have / encrypted, then you can leave /usr unencrypted as it |
| 7 | contains no secrets. Also /usr can remain mounted read-only most of the |
| 8 | time, so there is a reduced chance of accidental corruption. |
| 9 | I don't know the number of users who might want this, and I imagine it |
| 10 | is difficult to count them. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | > I dislike the idea of moving libglib-2.0, libdbus-1, libdbus-glib-1, and |
| 13 | > couple of dozen more libs to / |
| 14 | |
| 15 | If you say that /usr must be on the same filesystem as /, then there is |
| 16 | no real reason to not just make a symlink /usr -> . |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Best regards, |
| 20 | Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? | DarKRaveR <dark@×××××××××.org> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |