1 |
Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> got out of hand. Perhaps the goal was laudable, but the methods were |
4 |
> not? (As an aside, I didn't realize that Roy's e-mail was supposed to |
5 |
> be a proctor directive.) Or are people really looking for the proctors |
6 |
> to get involved only when behavior is particularly egregious? Is there |
7 |
|
8 |
I find it disappointing (maybe "telling", if one is less charitable) that the |
9 |
Proctors never censured the original poster for either the tone of the |
10 |
message, nor the personal invective it contained, and still haven't. I'd |
11 |
imagine clear violations of the CoC to result in at least a public |
12 |
admonishment and warning. |
13 |
|
14 |
-- |
15 |
...jsled |
16 |
http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo ${a}@${b} |