| 1 |
Mask it. It's too new to adapt. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
2010/5/11 Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Hello guys, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> as I'm sure some of you already experimented, the libpng upgrade didn't |
| 8 |
> exactly went smoothly on my chroots. Reason seems to be that libpng |
| 9 |
> usage is odd, it provides both libpng14.* and libpng.* files. Some |
| 10 |
> packages likes to use versioned libs while some other don't and it seems |
| 11 |
> to lead to giant mess in *.la files (for example). |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> My question are: |
| 14 |
> * is there a draft news item as a simple revdep-rebuild or portage |
| 15 |
> preserved-libs feature doesn't cut it (for good reasons) that I could |
| 16 |
> test ? |
| 17 |
> * what is the recommended way to link to libpng (versioned lib or not) |
| 18 |
> * corollary to previous question, should we enforce link to versioned |
| 19 |
> lib only ? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> -- |
| 22 |
> Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
| 23 |
> Gentoo |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
Archives