| 1 |
Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> What the hell do you think the tree is? It's a bunch of arbitrary |
| 4 |
> packages maintained loosely by subgroups of people; you're stating |
| 5 |
> that sunrise is too loose yet gentoo-x86 is fundamentally no |
| 6 |
> different. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Sunrise is pretty much the same damn thing. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Or maybe he means the "Gentoo developers" are an elite group of flawless |
| 11 |
people, blessed by the mighty ebuild quizz ? That elitism would in the |
| 12 |
end kill us, and I thank the Sunrise project for opening up Gentoo a |
| 13 |
little more to the community. We may have to lose a few elitist fellows |
| 14 |
in the process, but I still stand by the Council decision that it was |
| 15 |
the right thing to do. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I just can't see how an ebuild directly committed without peer review to |
| 18 |
the tree is necessary better than an ebuild contributed by a power user |
| 19 |
and peer-reviewed by a Gentoo developer, ending up in a repository you |
| 20 |
have to choose to use... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Koon |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives