| 1 |
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 13:33, Spider wrote: |
| 2 |
> begin quote |
| 3 |
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 07:10:13 -0400 |
| 4 |
> Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > > Transparency is improved by installing the "cdrw-base" package, |
| 8 |
> > > which |
| 9 |
> > > will add devfs.d and modules.d entries to make cdburning "just |
| 10 |
> > > work". |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > This was a small evenings work + testing made by me and Azarah, and |
| 13 |
> > > current proposal is to make cdrdao and cdrecord depend on this |
| 14 |
> > > package. |
| 15 |
> > > |
| 16 |
> > > Could I get some testers / comments on it, please? |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Does the user still need to be in the cdrw group? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Yes. And they still need ide-scsi compiled as a module (or into the |
| 22 |
> kernel) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Just curious, but why? There's no need for ide-scsi in most cases. |
| 25 |
There are probably quite a few people whom are using ide-scsi when the |
| 26 |
ATAPI interface works perfectly fine. Is ide-scsi a requirement of this |
| 27 |
ebuild or is it simply "a working burning setup"? I'm just curious |
| 28 |
before I go testing, since my machines either have a) SCSI burners, or |
| 29 |
b) use ATAPI perfectly. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 33 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 34 |
Games Team |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Is your power animal a pengiun? |
Archives