| 1 |
On Saturday, July 26, 2003, at 07:37 AM, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 09:33:07AM -0500 or thereabouts, bdharring |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> Also, are you advocating the distfile mirrors carry a *complete* |
| 6 |
>> distfile mirror, or a partial? I'm curious what the space savings |
| 7 |
>> would be... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Distfile mirrors would be required to carry the full /distfiles |
| 10 |
> directory. |
| 11 |
What space savings are avoided by not carrying the portage tree? Last |
| 12 |
I had checked, I believe the tree was roughly in the range of 100mbs or |
| 13 |
so. |
| 14 |
I guess I'm curious if I'm missing something, since 100 mb's (if I'm |
| 15 |
correct) while is a space saving, it really isn't all that much in |
| 16 |
comparison to the distfile dir.... |
| 17 |
~bdh |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> --kurt |
| 20 |
> <mime-attachment> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives