Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mark Loeser <halcyon@××××××××××.com>
To: absinthe@g.o
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: patches.gentoo.org
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:05:24
Message-Id: 416EEA07.30401@whiterapid.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: patches.gentoo.org by Dylan Carlson
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Dylan Carlson wrote:
5 | Here here.
6 |
7 | Regardless of what we agree the pathname should be, it's a good idea.
8 |
9 | I'd also like to see a naming convention of patches established. (crowd
10 | moans: "not more red tape!") OK, perhaps more of a guideline/best
11 | practices than a requirement. Right now I don't believe there is one...
12 | is there? It would be refreshing to look at that patch repository and
13 see
14 | clarity and consistency in naming, as that will be a large listing of
15 | files.
16
17 I agree, this would be a very good policy to put into place. Removing
18 all of the patches from the tree will help to reduce its size, by how
19 much has already been a topic of debate, but it would help regardless.
20 If it doesn't make that big of a difference now, it has the potential of
21 stopping this from becoming a bigger problem in the future.
22
23 The tree is growing at a very large rate and rsync times are taking a
24 lot longer now than they did for me a year or so ago. Removing all of
25 the patches from the tree will definitely help this, but I think other
26 policies should be more strictly inforced as well. There are some very
27 large files in the tree currently that aren't patches, like enormous
28 Changelogs for a few packages, and also a lot of old ebuilds that are
29 sitting around for some packages. It'd be nice if the tree was kept as
30 clean as possible to keep rsync times down as much as possible.
31
32 Mark
33 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
34 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
35 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
36
37 iD8DBQFBbuoHZPlCVB9SdGIRApTpAJ92YzwcPjge6QMofhdpnmx9Z0BpuACdFMK6
38 AtTFt0hR3utggvOnar7cBU0=
39 =85Ee
40 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
41
42 --
43 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: patches.gentoo.org Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>