| 1 |
On Tue October 12 2004 15:09, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> The proposal is to get infrastructure to provide a temporary location |
| 3 |
> for developers to upload patches which are necessary to be immediately |
| 4 |
> available to users. This space would be writable by all CVS developers |
| 5 |
> and would be accessible to the world via http. Developers would use |
| 6 |
> this space for temporary storage only for patches which are |
| 7 |
> created/rolled in-house. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Here here. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Regardless of what we agree the pathname should be, it's a good idea. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I'd also like to see a naming convention of patches established. (crowd |
| 14 |
moans: "not more red tape!") OK, perhaps more of a guideline/best |
| 15 |
practices than a requirement. Right now I don't believe there is one... |
| 16 |
is there? It would be refreshing to look at that patch repository and see |
| 17 |
clarity and consistency in naming, as that will be a large listing of |
| 18 |
files. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Cheers, |
| 21 |
Dylan Carlson [absinthe@g.o] |
| 22 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives