Archives
Archives
| From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012) | ||
| Date: | Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:26:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEdQ38HSZReJ=va0CeQdb76F5h8biuFYJDVKxsq1oNg75u8LAg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012) by Walter Dnes |
||
| 1 | On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 | >> As I posted elsewhere, working on a project based on "hate" only lasts |
| 3 | >> so long. I should know, that's the reason I started udev in the first |
| 4 | >> place over 9 years ago. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > The Xfree86 people generated a lot of hate, just like Sievers and |
| 7 | > Poettering. Xorg hasn't burned out yet. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Let's be fair. The Xorg fork was done by a lot of really competent |
| 10 | professional developers who had been developing XFree86 for a long |
| 11 | time. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012) | "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com> |