Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Kunze <michael.kunze@×××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Policy/thoughts for ebuilds that survive only because of mirror caches? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 01 Jan 2004 13:40:59 | ||
| Message-Id: | bt180p$p14$1@sea.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy/thoughts for ebuilds that survive only because of mirror caches? by Jon Portnoy |
||
| 1 | Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 2 | > I don't really see the value in crippling the tree because some SRC_URIs |
| 3 | > are bad. What we should be doing is finding the new SRC_URI - a lot of |
| 4 | > those files have just moved to new locations. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Isn't that the job of the maintainer? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Michael Kunze |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Policy/thoughts for ebuilds that survive only because of mirror caches? | Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> |