| 1 |
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:46:33AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:40:46 -0700 |
| 3 |
> Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > i dont particularly care about -r0, i'm just stating that banning |
| 5 |
> > > _alpha0/etc... is not acceptable. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Lay out your reasons please; the meaning doesn't differ (same version |
| 8 |
> > due to implicit 0 after all) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> But the PV does. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
PV varying first of all, isn't incredibly grand from where I'm |
| 13 |
sitting- yet more any versionator style code has to account for. |
| 14 |
Second, so what? We're talking about 15 ebuilds here. It's not as |
| 15 |
though the ebuilds are completely screwed in this- dealing with the PV |
| 16 |
change for the ebuild is pretty minor. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
~harring |
Archives