Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] explicit -r0 in ebuild filename | ||
| Date: | Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:46:47 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080331004633.6529e55c@snowcone | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] explicit -r0 in ebuild filename by Brian Harring |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:40:46 -0700 |
| 2 | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > > i dont particularly care about -r0, i'm just stating that banning |
| 4 | > > _alpha0/etc... is not acceptable. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > Lay out your reasons please; the meaning doesn't differ (same version |
| 7 | > due to implicit 0 after all) |
| 8 | |
| 9 | But the PV does. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] explicit -r0 in ebuild filename | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |