Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml?
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:10:06
Message-Id: 45F9367A.6000902@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml? by Steve Long
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Steve Long wrote:
5 > George Prowse wrote:
6 >
7 >> Stephen Bennett wrote:
8 >>> I'd rather make it known that that sort of backhanded tactics to get rid
9 >>> of someone you don't like won't work whoever uses them.
10 >>>
11 >> You would certainly make that point. then let the other employee leave
12 >> and let the employee in question know that it will not be tolerated in
13 >> the future. Therefore saving the services of one of the best employees
14 >> (and with it money) and also said employee knows /exactly/ where he
15 >> stands for the future.
16 >>
17 >> It is called man-management and people skills, something that is
18 >> severely lacking in Gentoo at the moment
19 >
20 > Mate that's the first time in ages that I've truly agreed with what you've
21 > written. I think I need a lie-down ;)
22 >
23
24 Fortunately some people value integrity above what you call "man-management and people skills".
25
26 Marijn
27 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
29 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
30
31 iD8DBQFF+TZ6p/VmCx0OL2wRAg1eAJ4+p4pAbWFLi3ZfU1GaopGQw/7huQCeLod2
32 Hdb0PUubrabQ0HkXEnHrY1Q=
33 =YoGb
34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
35 --
36 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml? George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com>
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml? Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>