| 1 |
On 04/24/2011 10:43 PM, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: |
| 2 |
> Getting that discussion back on top. |
| 3 |
>> Which is wrong, it should be /lib/foo instead, not $(get_libdir), to |
| 4 |
>> follow what udev and other software in Linux has been using for a very |
| 5 |
>> long time now. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Sounds like we should fix udev ebuild and some ebuilds installing udev rules to |
| 8 |
> not use /$(get_libdir)/udev, but plain /lib/udev. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Right, doesn't make sense to have both 32bit and 64bit ELF's for udev, |
| 11 |
so we should stick with /lib/udev. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I used that in believe that /lib is identical or links to /$(get_libdir) and |
| 15 |
> multilib-strict requires it, but it seems to be intelligent enough to only |
| 16 |
> deny 64-bit libs to go to /lib. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> So proper udev should use /lib/udev, correct? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Correct. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
The udev situation is really a mess tree-wide, we have ebuilds |
| 25 |
installing into 3 different directories now: |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
/etc/udev (where user puts his local rules) |
| 28 |
/$(get_libdir)/udev (as explained above) |
| 29 |
/lib/udev (the correct one) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Check the Portage to see the sad status of inconsistency: |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
$ grep -r 'etc.*udev' */*/*.ebuild |
| 34 |
$ grep -r 'get_libdir.*udev' */*/*.ebuild |
Archives