| 1 |
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 13:04 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'll also remove as-is from @GPL-COMPATIBLE and @OSI-APPROVED again, |
| 3 |
> as soon as all packages in the system set have been fixed (only |
| 4 |
> net-misc/openssh and sys-apps/man-pages). It shouldn't have been added |
| 5 |
> to these groups, in the first place. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I have been using "as-is" to mean licenses that allow anything and |
| 8 |
everything as long as the copyright notice is preserved. For example, |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
# This file is free software; the author(s) gives unlimited |
| 11 |
# permission to copy and/or distribute it, with or without |
| 12 |
# modifications, as long as this notice is preserved. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
If "as-is" will be removed from @GPL_COMPATIBLE, what gpl-compatible |
| 15 |
license should I use instead for such packages? |
Archives