Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Clarify the "as-is" license? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:06:25 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20577.36806.994687.73943@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Clarify the "as-is" license? by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | I've created licenses/HPND [1] now, and added it to the @OSI-APPROVED |
| 2 | group. So packages whose license matches this template can be changed |
| 3 | from as-is to HPND. (And please, _only_ OSD-compliant packages. |
| 4 | We don't want the same mess again, as we have with as-is.) |
| 5 | |
| 6 | I'll also remove as-is from @GPL-COMPATIBLE and @OSI-APPROVED again, |
| 7 | as soon as all packages in the system set have been fixed (only |
| 8 | net-misc/openssh and sys-apps/man-pages). It shouldn't have been added |
| 9 | to these groups, in the first place. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Ulrich |
| 12 | |
| 13 | [1] <http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/licenses/HPND> |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Clarify the "as-is" license? | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Clarify the "as-is" license? | Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Clarify the "as-is" license? | "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Clarify the "as-is" license? | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Clarify the "as-is" license? | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |