| 1 |
Ulrich Mueller schrieb: |
| 2 |
> I've created licenses/HPND [1] now, and added it to the @OSI-APPROVED |
| 3 |
> group. So packages whose license matches this template can be changed |
| 4 |
> from as-is to HPND. (And please, _only_ OSD-compliant packages. |
| 5 |
> We don't want the same mess again, as we have with as-is.) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I have one question: The license can be GPL-compatible but the software |
| 8 |
itself non-free. So binary-only packages distributed under e.g. BSD |
| 9 |
license should remain BSD or not? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If we start to measure the software freedom of the code inside the |
| 12 |
package, then maybe LICENSE is the wrong variable to express this. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Best regards, |
| 16 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Archives