Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 01:42:33
Message-Id: 20101203194637.03d8cbd3@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds by Gilles Dartiguelongue
1 On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:25:21 +0100
2 Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Le vendredi 03 décembre 2010 à 21:54 +0100, Cyprien Nicolas a écrit :
5 > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 21:25, Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> wrote:
6 > > > Please also find in these patches a proposal of a waf-utils eclass in
7 > > > order to put waf related build management into an eclass. There is a
8 > > > couple of ebuilds already in tree all doing things on their own and I
9 > > > had a prototype laying around that I had to complete in order to have
10 > > > hamster-applet-2.32.
11 > >
12 > > I took a look at the src_compile function from the proposed
13 > > waf-utils.eclass, and the sed expression you use is not correct, if
14 > > your objective is to filter everything but the -j/--jobs part of the
15 > > MAKEOPTS variable.
16 > > My current setting is MAKEOPTS="--jobs=3 --load-average=3.5", and it
17 > > is left unchanged by the current sed expression.
18 > >
19 > > I had a issue with waf, with that MAKEOPTS thing [1]
20 > > Maybe you could take the expression referred in comment #3 [1], as
21 > > Samuli did, or maybe someone else have a better proposition.
22 > >
23 > > 1 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335119
24 > >
25 >
26 > The sed expression in the proposed eclass is indeed too weak, I'll look
27 > after the one in this bug.
28
29 This has come up enough times that we should write some common code.
30
31 --
32 fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense
33 toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime
34 @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>