1 |
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:25:21 +0100 |
2 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Le vendredi 03 décembre 2010 à 21:54 +0100, Cyprien Nicolas a écrit : |
5 |
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 21:25, Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > > Please also find in these patches a proposal of a waf-utils eclass in |
7 |
> > > order to put waf related build management into an eclass. There is a |
8 |
> > > couple of ebuilds already in tree all doing things on their own and I |
9 |
> > > had a prototype laying around that I had to complete in order to have |
10 |
> > > hamster-applet-2.32. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > I took a look at the src_compile function from the proposed |
13 |
> > waf-utils.eclass, and the sed expression you use is not correct, if |
14 |
> > your objective is to filter everything but the -j/--jobs part of the |
15 |
> > MAKEOPTS variable. |
16 |
> > My current setting is MAKEOPTS="--jobs=3 --load-average=3.5", and it |
17 |
> > is left unchanged by the current sed expression. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > I had a issue with waf, with that MAKEOPTS thing [1] |
20 |
> > Maybe you could take the expression referred in comment #3 [1], as |
21 |
> > Samuli did, or maybe someone else have a better proposition. |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > 1 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335119 |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> |
26 |
> The sed expression in the proposed eclass is indeed too weak, I'll look |
27 |
> after the one in this bug. |
28 |
|
29 |
This has come up enough times that we should write some common code. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense |
33 |
toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime |
34 |
@ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |