Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:26:17
Message-Id: 1291415121.6774.6.camel@keitaro
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds by Cyprien Nicolas
1 Le vendredi 03 décembre 2010 à 21:54 +0100, Cyprien Nicolas a écrit :
2 > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 21:25, Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> wrote:
3 > > Please also find in these patches a proposal of a waf-utils eclass in
4 > > order to put waf related build management into an eclass. There is a
5 > > couple of ebuilds already in tree all doing things on their own and I
6 > > had a prototype laying around that I had to complete in order to have
7 > > hamster-applet-2.32.
8 >
9 > I took a look at the src_compile function from the proposed
10 > waf-utils.eclass, and the sed expression you use is not correct, if
11 > your objective is to filter everything but the -j/--jobs part of the
12 > MAKEOPTS variable.
13 > My current setting is MAKEOPTS="--jobs=3 --load-average=3.5", and it
14 > is left unchanged by the current sed expression.
15 >
16 > I had a issue with waf, with that MAKEOPTS thing [1]
17 > Maybe you could take the expression referred in comment #3 [1], as
18 > Samuli did, or maybe someone else have a better proposition.
19 >
20 > 1 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335119
21 >
22
23 The sed expression in the proposed eclass is indeed too weak, I'll look
24 after the one in this bug.
25 --
26 Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o>
27 Gentoo

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>