| 1 |
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:46:37 -0600 |
| 2 |
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:25:21 +0100 |
| 5 |
> Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > Le vendredi 03 décembre 2010 à 21:54 +0100, Cyprien Nicolas a |
| 8 |
> > écrit : |
| 9 |
> > > I had a issue with waf, with that MAKEOPTS thing [1] |
| 10 |
> > > Maybe you could take the expression referred in comment #3 [1], as |
| 11 |
> > > Samuli did, or maybe someone else have a better proposition. |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > 1 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335119 |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > The sed expression in the proposed eclass is indeed too weak, I'll |
| 16 |
> > look after the one in this bug. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> This has come up enough times that we should write some common code. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Well, if we're to commonize out some code, I'd suggest starting with |
| 21 |
scons_clean_makeopts() from scons-utils.eclass -- it's pretty *readable* |
| 22 |
and working variant of MAKEOPTS cleaning, in pure bash. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Best regards, |
| 26 |
Michał Górny |
Archives