| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
line 16 ("renamed the file to |
| 4 |
/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules") and line 18 ("you can |
| 5 |
override in /etc/systemd/network/") doesn't end with punctuation. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Did I get this right? I am using udev to give my interfaces custom names |
| 9 |
and I am not a systemd user but to keep my setup working with udev-210 I |
| 10 |
have to exclude |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
/lib/systemd/network/ |
| 13 |
/etc/systemd/ |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
from my INSTALL_MASK *and* I have to configure things in |
| 16 |
"/etc/systemd/"? Really? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Also, I cannot belief that I cannot overwrite |
| 19 |
"/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules" via "/etc/udev/rules.d"... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Anyway: |
| 23 |
Don't get me wrong. Yes, I don't use systemd and I am a happy OpenRC |
| 24 |
user but I have no problems with systemd (as long as it doesn't affects |
| 25 |
me). But this upgrade seems to affect non-systemd users. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Wasn't Gentoo about choices? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
So when it is possible to provide a sys-fs/udev package like Lars |
| 30 |
(Polynomial-C) has shown which won't require non-systemd user to use |
| 31 |
files from systemd and to do configuration in "/etc/systemd/" why don't |
| 32 |
we provide such a package to non-systemd users? |
| 33 |
The package already has an "openrc" USE flag... |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Remember that the non-systemd folk in Gentoo is doing a lot to help you |
| 36 |
(the systemd folk) to add proper systemd support in Gentoo. Now it seems |
| 37 |
like it is time to give something "back", => make sure a change required |
| 38 |
for systemd doesn't hurt non-systemd users. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Thanks. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-Thomas |
Archives