1 |
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 16:52, Jean Jordaan wrote: |
2 |
> >> but how about make more than 2 |
3 |
> >> levels in portage, as in OpenBSD's ports tree ? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> My personal feeling is that many packages don't belong in only one |
6 |
> category. E.g. in portage currently: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> * app-text/yudit |
9 |
> Description: free (Y)unicode text editor for all unices |
10 |
> |
11 |
> * app-editors/jedit |
12 |
> Description: Programmer's editor written in Java |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Both make sense, and app-editors/yudit & app-editors/yudit would |
15 |
> also make sense. Instead of categories, ebuilds should have a |
16 |
> CATEGORY variable. E.g. |
17 |
|
18 |
Portage support would be required to support deeper trees. The problem |
19 |
with symlinks is that we use CVS for our portage tree, which doesn't |
20 |
support symlinks (or graceful renaming, or ...); unfortunately, it's the |
21 |
best game in town for us right now. |
22 |
|
23 |
I agree w/ Vapier on this one. The short-term fix should be fine, and |
24 |
I, too, would like to see support for a more heirarchical portage tree |
25 |
in a future version of portage. |
26 |
|
27 |
-g2boojum- |
28 |
-- |
29 |
Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> |