From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Cc: | Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion 1/2 | ||
Date: | Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:29:37 | ||
Message-Id: | 200601191928.53079.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion 1/2 by Mark Loeser |
1 | On Thursday 19 January 2006 18:52, Mark Loeser wrote: |
2 | > Please lets avoid this assumption. I'd love to make it so we never make |
3 | > this assumption anywhere in the tree so that we could actually build GCC |
4 | > without pie or ssp, instead of generating all of the GCC profiles for every |
5 | > user. |
6 | |
7 | pie is in upstream gcc so your argument here is INVALID |
8 | |
9 | please move along, kthx |
10 | -mike |
11 | -- |
12 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion 1/2 | "Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo)" <kevquinn@g.o> |