| 1 |
Robin H. Johnson wrote: [Sat Apr 30 2005, 06:44:58PM CDT] |
| 2 |
> Ok, I've just put the latest OpenLDAP 2.2.26 into the tree, and I don't |
| 3 |
> see anything that is now holding back the 2.2 series from ~arch. In 2 |
| 4 |
> weeks, I plan to move it to ~arch, from it's present p.mask status. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> It shouldn't cause any problems for anybody that has OpenLDAP installed |
| 7 |
> as a client only, but it's a bit bumpy for those that are running |
| 8 |
> OpenLDAP servers. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The ebuild will exit if it detects the server data files from the |
| 11 |
> previous versions of OpenLDAP, and display instructions on how to |
| 12 |
> upgrade safely. Bypass them at your own peril, as you will end up with a |
| 13 |
> badly corrupted database. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Also note that the slapd.conf syntax has had some minor but annoying |
| 16 |
> changes that will block slapd from starting until they are updated. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Thanks for the note. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
My personal opinion is that this sort of news item is the sort of thing |
| 21 |
that we need to do a better job of announcing widely. I'm going to CC |
| 22 |
the GWN folks on this e-mail as well as our PR folks, to see if either |
| 23 |
of those groups want it. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-g2boojum- |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Grant Goodyear |
| 28 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 29 |
g2boojum@g.o |
| 30 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
| 31 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |
Archives