1 |
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 08:18 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:58:20 -0500 Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
> | > A far better justification than you've given currently. |
5 |
> | |
6 |
> | How about hacking on open source is done so that people can scratch |
7 |
> | an itch. No developer has to be a slave to the demands of others if |
8 |
> | it doesn't scratch that developer's itch. |
9 |
> | |
10 |
> | A baselayout without bash scratches Roy's itch. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Which is all very well, but not sufficient reason to screw up a project |
13 |
> that is developed and used by a lot of people. |
14 |
|
15 |
He's not "screwing up" anything. He's making changes he wishes as the |
16 |
author and maintainer of the package. If someone doesn't like it, they |
17 |
can fork it and maintain their own package. Isn't that just wonderful? |
18 |
Seriously, Roy can work on whatever he wants how he wants, just like any |
19 |
of the rest of us. Anyone who doesn't like it can simply fork the |
20 |
project, or even create a new project to replace the functionality |
21 |
provided by this package. It happens all the time. I seem to remember |
22 |
it happening with this package manager we all are familiar with... |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Chris Gianelloni |
26 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
27 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
28 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
29 |
Gentoo Foundation |