1 |
On 02-01-2006 20:03:54 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 12:50 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: |
3 |
> > I guess I'm almost hinting at that Gentoo needs a single entity that's |
4 |
> > sole purpose is to drive/research the direction and goals for Gentoo. |
5 |
|
6 |
Or call it proper hierarchy. Management. Probably all evil words, in |
7 |
this context, but they for sure apply. |
8 |
|
9 |
> > It'd be almost ceo-like, but the council is still top dawg. Right now, I |
10 |
> > view our group as a bunch of chiefs with no real single leader saying |
11 |
> > "lets strive to do this". The main problem is, too many people fear |
12 |
> > about such a person could turn into a dictator, so I'm not sure if this |
13 |
> > could ever happen. |
14 |
> I wonder if any single person would be accepted? |
15 |
|
16 |
If it isn't one person, then you would need to find two persons or even |
17 |
more that are completely aligned and have the same visions. Since |
18 |
leaders usually are charismatic and controversial where necessary to |
19 |
achieve their goals, it is hard to find two that don't get conflicts, |
20 |
stalling any vision to become a mission. |
21 |
|
22 |
> After all there is noone capable of forcing anyone to do anything as far |
23 |
> as I can tell - worst case you fork Gentoo (again) and don't resolve |
24 |
> the issues. |
25 |
|
26 |
...or only resolve the ones that you care about. Your first sentence |
27 |
forms the basis of the problem, IMHO. |
28 |
|
29 |
> > This person would be in constant contact of all the |
30 |
> > groups and try to muck together what everyone is doing. They could |
31 |
> > suggest things to help minimize user impact, maybe try to join two |
32 |
> > projects if they are both working on a similar goal, thus minimizing the |
33 |
> > workload. Stuff like that essentially. |
34 |
> Communication ... should happen anyway, but it seems to get more and |
35 |
> more difficult. Another layer of bureaucracy won't help that ... |
36 |
|
37 |
Call it "bureaucrazy", or whatever you like. I think it has nothing |
38 |
to do with bureaucracy at all. It's just a matter of having |
39 |
communication on a high level, in order to get an overall view of |
40 |
Gentoo. IIRC this is one of the tasks of the council, to align teams |
41 |
somehow, for example. |
42 |
|
43 |
> > We need a good visionary. If such |
44 |
> > a position were created, I also think that person's sole focus should be |
45 |
> > that focus within Gentoo. (i.e. they aren't a major contributor for a |
46 |
> > subproject in Gentoo). This position would take too much time for them |
47 |
> > to keep those other duties. |
48 |
> ... and you'd burn out a capable person within half a year I think |
49 |
|
50 |
Depends on the person. Lance is just putting a lot of Mintzberg and |
51 |
probably (work) experience on the table to apply it to Gentoo. |
52 |
But ok, fine, if that's the case, gives a nice refresh rate :) (j/k) |
53 |
|
54 |
> > Dunno, maybe I'm the loner here thinking this... |
55 |
|
56 |
Well, you're not alone for sure ;) However, the amount of measures to |
57 |
take, why and what are a bit of an open question to me. I do, however, |
58 |
share your concerns of a missing 'Mission Statement'. It is a commonly |
59 |
known problem and primary point of concern (ie. Heene). |
60 |
|
61 |
|
62 |
-- |
63 |
Fabian Groffen |
64 |
-- |
65 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |