Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion?
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:58:42
Message-Id: 20050412195721.2e12759c@snowdrop
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion? by Paul de Vrieze
1 On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:50:36 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
2 wrote:
3 | On Monday 11 April 2005 22:42, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
4 | > Well, surprisingly enough, one of the main reasons we use these
5 | > version control things is so that we can see *what changed*. It's a
6 | > hell of a lot easier to do this when you can just say "show me
7 | > everything that changed in the foo project between three days ago
8 | > and today" rather than having to worry about adding in extra
9 | > selections to pick a project path.
10 |
11 | You need to do this anyway. Whether it's a path inside the repository
12 | or on the webserver doesn't matter. It's like
13 | https://svn.gentoo.org/gentoo/projA where /gentoo is the name of the
14 | repos or https://svn.gentoo.org/gentoo/projA where /gentoo is a
15 | superdirectory of all project repositories that are now housed in the
16 | gentoo cvs repository. In either case /gentoo could be removed.
17
18 No, with certain operations you need to start giving entire paths if and
19 only if you're not operating on the repo as a whole.
20
21 | > One big repository is harder to work with. It's that simple.
22 |
23 | With one exception, that is, sharing and merging within a repository
24 | is a lot easier than between two separate repositories.
25
26 Which is an extremely rare task compared to doing things like diffs and
27 branch merges...
28
29 --
30 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools)
31 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
32 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion? Christian Parpart <trapni@g.o>