| 1 |
Chris White wrote: |
| 2 |
> Alright, so here's what I think on the whole thing now that I made a nice tidy |
| 3 |
> [Summary] thread. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> There seems to be some concern about AT testers having more privileges than |
| 6 |
> some other devs. First off, I hope everyone saw the readonly access, and |
| 7 |
> even so, the whole point of this thing is to make development smoother. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Let me clarify here. I'm not concerned about ATs having more privileges |
| 10 |
at all. I just want to know why if we're making them full developers |
| 11 |
for all intents and purposes, we don't go the extra step and get them |
| 12 |
commit access after a probationary period? It seems like this is |
| 13 |
supposed to be the end goal anyway. Basically, I feel like this GLEP |
| 14 |
goes outside the bounds of what I think of when somebody mentions the |
| 15 |
arch testers. Maybe it's just me though. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-Steve |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives