| 1 |
<snip> |
| 2 |
> > As for transforming, would it really be needed? I've spent a bit of |
| 3 |
> > time rooting through the distfile dir and I don't recall seeing |
| 4 |
> > non-versioned names, although as always, I could be wrong. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> You are wrong there are even auxiliary files in the distfiles repository. |
| 7 |
> Unversioned tarbals are though, certainly not helping to get a package into |
| 8 |
> the repository. Sometimes we provide a versioned version of a tarbal on the |
| 9 |
> portage mirrors. |
| 10 |
I'm guessing what you're saying is that I'm wrong on the 'auxiliary |
| 11 |
files' aspect? Example? Unless you were referencing my comment about |
| 12 |
non-versionned tarballs... I guess I don't follow on what I'm wrong |
| 13 |
about. |
| 14 |
As for changing the name of a tarball locally so it's versioned, that |
| 15 |
doesn't strike me as the best solution- the name change ought to take |
| 16 |
place at the server/mirror level. Course that's my opinion... |
| 17 |
~Brian |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives