1 |
I'm not talking about selectively disabling cups. My proposal is |
2 |
>>> to no longer enable the cups useflag in the base profile. I don't |
3 |
>>> think cups should be part of the base profile, and as a result |
4 |
>>> cascading to the desktop profile. And a lot of people seem to |
5 |
>>> agree. Users can always enable that functionality when they |
6 |
>>> need it. It is not something that is necessary for running a |
7 |
>>> desktop system. |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> Cheers, |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>> I agree that CUPS is not really necessary in the desktop profile, and |
12 |
>> especially in the base profile. Many systems run desktop |
13 |
>> environments without needing printing support. As we advance further |
14 |
>> toward a paperless computing experience, the need for printing |
15 |
>> support becomes even less. And, as it is incredibly simple to add |
16 |
>> print capabilities by placing the cups USE flag in /etc/make.conf, |
17 |
>> that choice should be left to the user. |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> Regards, |
20 |
>> Nathan Zachary |
21 |
> |
22 |
> One could argue the opposite as well. Adding -cups to make.conf is |
23 |
> just as easy. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I'm one of those lowly users. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Dale |
28 |
> |
29 |
> :-) :-) |
30 |
> |
31 |
I think that the point is that it is better to have it disabled by |
32 |
default so that new users do not run into these circular dependencies |
33 |
upon their first installation. They can then add cups to their |
34 |
make.conf and emerge -avuDN world to get full printing support. |
35 |
|
36 |
Just as a sidebar, there is not a "lowly user." Your input is greatly |
37 |
important in all matters regarding Gentoo as you are a member of the |
38 |
userbase. It's your operating system too! :) |
39 |
|
40 |
Regards, |
41 |
Nathan Zachary |