Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matthew Summers <quantumsummers@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC patch for subversion.eclass (bug 401737)
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:34:52
Message-Id: CAET+hMTXnB+7+RqHWRWDka2FbKDBds_5j6pfOTx4LdMPZsoaZQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC patch for subversion.eclass (bug 401737) by Gilles Dartiguelongue
1 On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> wrote:
2 > Le dimanche 19 février 2012 à 12:06 +0100, Justin a écrit :
3 >> Hi,
4 >>
5 >> any objections against following patch for subversion.eclass?
6 >> Fixes bug 401737. Basically respects ESVN_{USER,PASSWORD} during
7 >> reemerge of a package.
8 >>
9 >>
10 >> --- subversion.eclass 2012-02-07 11:56:27.000000000 +0200
11 >> +++ subversion.eclass 2012-02-07 11:59:38.000000000 +0200
12 >> @@ -469,7 +469,9 @@
13 >>       local target="${1}"
14 >>       local key="${2}"
15 >>
16 >> -     env LC_ALL=C svn info "${target}" | grep -i "^${key}" | cut -d" " -f2-
17 >> +     env LC_ALL=C svn info \
18 >> +             ${options} --username "${ESVN_USER}" --password "${ESVN_PASSWORD}" \
19 >> +             "${target}" | grep -i "^${key}" | cut -d" " -f2-
20 >>  }
21 >>
22 >>  ## -- subversion__get_repository_uri()
23 >> --------------------------------------- #
24 >
25 > I'm not an expert of the subversion eclass, but the diff looks good.
26 >
27 > --
28 > Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o>
29 > Gentoo
30
31 Why would you want a password in an ebuild? The var ESVN_PASSWORD
32 seems like trouble to me.
33
34 --
35 Matthew W. Summers
36 Gentoo Foundation Inc.

Replies