1 |
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:12 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> Indeed. Even after the general gui-provider can be assumed to be wayland |
3 |
> in much the same was as it has been X for decades now, rootless/nested X |
4 |
> will be around for many years/decades, for much the same reason that I'm |
5 |
> still using dosbox to effectively provide "nested DOS" for that single |
6 |
> legacy/proprietary game[1] I still play somewhat frequently. Some |
7 |
> things, in particular X-based proprietary apps such as but not limited to |
8 |
> games, are unlikely to ever be ported, so those continuing to find a use |
9 |
> for them will continue to have a use for X, almost certainly eventually |
10 |
> in nested and ultimately emulated form, much as I do with that game and |
11 |
> dosbox. |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
You are likely right. There are contractors with stories of the US |
15 |
Government running mission critical infrastructure on servers which |
16 |
emulate an older computer, which in turn is emulating an even older |
17 |
computer. |
18 |
|
19 |
> I actually really like the ux-* idea. So much so I wish I'd thought of |
20 |
> it. =:^) It doesn't come across as nearly as "tired and worn out" as |
21 |
> "gui-*" does, here (tho I already see a reply from someone else with the |
22 |
> opposite reaction, favoring desktop-* over ux-*). |
23 |
> |
24 |
|
25 |
My apologies, sir, for making myself known; please understand it was |
26 |
never my intention to be a nuisance. I simply send things to this list |
27 |
so that I can feel like I am doing something. Up until now I had not |
28 |
been sure my messages were readable. |
29 |
|
30 |
us·er ex·pe·ri·ence |
31 |
noun: user experience; plural noun: user experiences |
32 |
the overall experience of a person using a product such as a |
33 |
website or computer application, especially in terms of how easy or |
34 |
pleasing it is to use. |
35 |
|
36 |
From this definition, I see no connection to anything graphical. To |
37 |
the extent that words have meaning I think the selection of "ux-*" |
38 |
would be a mistake. |
39 |
|
40 |
Respectfully, |
41 |
R0b0t1 |