1 |
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:10:21 -0400 Chris Gianelloni |
2 |
<wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> Well, mlmmj doesn't have this sort of feature. Instead, it has a more |
4 |
> procmail-like access list. We can use that to put users into a |
5 |
> read-only status, by filtering for them and denying posting from them, |
6 |
> but that still doesn't change my opinion that participation on the |
7 |
> mailing lists, including *receiving* mails, is a privilege, not a |
8 |
> right. Currently, it is a privilege that we extend to anyone, and we |
9 |
> have not revoked it except in dire circumstances. |
10 |
|
11 |
Then why are there public archives? |
12 |
|
13 |
-- |
14 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
15 |
Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org |
16 |
Web : http://ciaranm.org/ |
17 |
Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/ |