| 1 |
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 00:02 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
snip... |
| 4 |
> Indeed, your name is everywhere when it comes down to rox thing. Because |
| 5 |
> your dedication on rox subject, I am willing to help you become a dev, |
| 6 |
> but I need to be sure you are not going to dissapear in the very next |
| 7 |
> moment. |
| 8 |
> Gentoo history is full of such individuals who only want to be sure that |
| 9 |
> they could become devs but are not willing to put any effort behind it. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Do you want be a dev? Are you sure you could take the heat? What do you |
| 12 |
> expect from Gentoo and what do you have to offer in exchange? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Please email me the answers to these questions on my private address. I |
| 15 |
> need to know you a bit before I decide if I could mentor you or not. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Thank you for the opportunity. Apparently though, my submissions have |
| 18 |
already been rejected Ciaran. It's important to realize that the |
| 19 |
submissions were intended to AID the developers, not to necessarily be |
| 20 |
PERFECT in every way. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I submitted the ebuilds in good faith in the hope they would help myself |
| 23 |
and others get the portage tree wrt ROX up to date and correct |
| 24 |
breakages. In that my "spacing" was not liked, or my "descriptions" were |
| 25 |
too long is irrelevant. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
The ebuilds are fine, and they work. You are welcome to them. As for |
| 28 |
future development, due to possible problems with the rox.eclass, I am |
| 29 |
taking rox off-line from gentoo and will maintain it separate from |
| 30 |
gentoo. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
As for any open bugs, I leave it to maintainer-wanted. Good luck. |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Peter |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives